Sustainable healthcare, healthy returns
- Cost is the principal sustainability challenge facing the global healthcare sector
- Rising expenses for governments and individuals make care inaccessible to millions
- Change needed to address affordability creates opportunities for investors
- Proactive stock selection and engagement can help drive healthcare solutions and generate returns
Once the pandemic fades, tough fiscal choices await. There will be pressure to rein in government spending, of which healthcare is a major part. It accounts for one fifth of expenditure in G7 countries – a figure that continues to grow, as it does globally. Budget constraints are forcing treatment access restrictions, denying some patients therapies required to treat their disease. Furthermore, high out-of-pocket payments drive medical debt that contributes to more than 60 per cent of US personal bankruptcies. This is not sustainable. Thankfully, alternative approaches are emerging through new treatment options, technologies and business models. These can ultimately make healthcare more affordable – helping consumers, governments and society. The innovation and scale required is an opportunity for companies and investors alike.
Global government health expenditure per capita
Source: World Bank/World Health Organization Global Health Expenditure database
This commentary provides a high level overview of the recent economic environment, and is for information purposes only. It is a marketing communication and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to any reader of this content to buy or sell investments nor should it be regarded as investment research. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of its dissemination.
Sustainability in healthcare
While ESG considerations offer one way to evaluate sustainability, with regard to healthcare they do not fully capture the underlying issues and their investment implications.
Cost is the principal sustainability challenge facing the healthcare sector. As medical costs continue to grow, a basic social need becomes increasingly inaccessible to much of the population. Over 40 per cent of US patients, for instance, missed a treatment dose last year due to cost or other factors1. This issue will only be exacerbated by heavy debt burdens facing governments in the aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Debt to GDP ratios have risen rapidly
Source: IMF, HSBC Global Asset Management, November 2020 Any forecast, projection or target where provided is indicative only and not guaranteed in any way. HSBC Asset Management accepts no liability for any failure to meet such forecast, projection or target.
As we emerge from the pandemic there will be pressure to rein in government
spending, of which healthcare plays an outsized role. Healthcare accounts for one fifth of government expenditure in G7 countries2, with its share up to one quarter in the US after doubling over the last three decades3. Lack of ability to absorb further cost growth creates unappealing consequences.
Expensive treatments in particular, no matter how innovative from a medical perspective, can become inaccessible in the absence of sufficient state support. This occurs through prohibitive out-of-pocket costs, and no reimbursement whatsoever for some high-priced therapies. Patients in the UK, for example, do not have access to a third of new treatments due to being deemed not cost-effective by the responsible government body. Health outcomes are negatively impacted, as are industry and investor returns.
The scope of change needed to stop the cycle of spiralling costs and deliver sustainable healthcare systems creates investment opportunities. Proactive investing can contribute to the necessary change while at the same time generating sustainable returns. Importantly, while ESG considerations offer one way to evaluate sustainability, with regard to healthcare they do not fully capture the underlying issues and their investment implications. Expert knowledge and industry experience is required.
Rising costs for governments and individuals
The collision of ballooning health- care costs and strained budgets makes hard choices for policy makers.
Health spending consistently outpaces GDP growth across lower and higher income countries alike. In the US, which accounts for nearly half of global healthcare expenditure, total spend is projected to increase by over 50 per cent in the next eight years alone5.
Health spending outpaces GDP growth across markets
Source: World Health Organization Report – Global Spending on Health: A World in Transition, 2019
The collision of ballooning healthcare costs and strained budgets makes hard choices for policy makers. Governments must decide what therapies they can afford to subsidise. Insurers, as the healthcare payers, are left to determine treatment access restrictions in order to protect their profitability. Barred treatments and high out-of-pocket costs leave patients unable to benefit from the latest scientific breakthroughs. Over 40 per cent of American patients, for instance, are unable to obtain enough of the relevant therapy required to treat their disease6.
Out-of-pocket costs are rising for individuals even as governments foot more of the bill
Source: World Bank/World Health Organization Global Health Expenditure database
Higher out-of-pocket costs exacerbate the wealth divide, leaving patients without considerable savings to incur large debts or go without care.
Higher out-of-pocket costs exacerbate the wealth divide, leaving patients without considerable savings to incur large debts or go without care. For example, one fifth of Italians do not have access to medical care, with eight million patients spending their entire savings on medical expenses7 . In Australia, less than half of cancer drugs approved by the FDA and EMA are reimbursed8 . And in the US, over 40 per cent of new cancer patients are forced to spend their life savings on treatments, with survivors and their families left with massive debt9 . The combination of high medical bills with time out of work contribute to two thirds of US personal bankruptcies 10.
Meanwhile in developing countries where governments have less ability to subsidise healthcare, even more of the cost burden falls on individuals. Lower incomes mean patients frequently go without treatment due to lack of means to pay. Across low-income countries, average health spending was only $40 a person in 2018, compared with $3,300 in high income countries – a difference of 80 times 11.
Out-of-pocket costs as percentage of healthcare spend is much higher in lower income countries
Source: World Bank/World Health Organization Global Health Expenditure database. Data as of 2018.
Least developed countries as classified by the UN.
Solutions require new ways of thinking
Addressing healthcare expenses more holistically opens the door to significant efficiencies and cost reductions.
In order to alter this trajectory of unsustainable cost growth that leaves healthcare inaccessible, tomorrow’s leading healthcare companies will need to deliver solutions that improve patient outcomes without adding costs. A simple example that gained traction in past years was the shift to generic prescription drugs. They now account for about 80 per cent of the global market for medicines, with an even higher penetration of 90 per cent in the US12
Proportion of branded versus generic drug prescriptions dispensed in the United States
Source: Statista, 2021
Yet in spite of wide scale adoption, generic drugs haven’t made a notable dent in tackling healthcare affordability and hence on their own do not create a sustainable healthcare system. Someone still has to do the initial research to achieve the scientific breakthroughs that create the medicines that are eventually replicated by generics. To drive that innovation, it must be rewarded. More holistic solutions are needed.
Per the following chart, healthcare costs are spread across various components of a system. While a patient’s treatment will span multiple components, these costs are typically managed independently. Addressing these expenses more holistically opens the door to significant efficiencies and cost reductions.
Division of healthcare costs (OECD Average, 2017)
Source: OECD Health Data, 2019
With nearly 75 per cent of total healthcare costs spent on patient care, solutions that can reduce time in care are critically important.
Alzheimer’s provides an example of why a holistic approach is essential. If a new, breakthrough treatment was ever brought to market, currently there are no existing treatments to displace and drive cost reductions from. However, the costs for Alzheimer’s patients and their families across the healthcare system are massive, and could quite easily offset the cost of a reasonably priced treatment.
Pharmaceutical companies that actively identify and target wider cost savings, or cost-offsets, as part of their research and development processes, will create larger opportunities for the treatments they bring to market. Most importantly, this would help avoid the cycle of perpetual additive costs. With nearly 75 per cent of total healthcare costs spent on patient care, solutions that can reduce time in care are critically important.
This can be achieved not only through new treatments that better manage or even cure chronic ailments, but also through diagnostic tools that allow for earlier identification of diseases for more effective treatment, as well as devices and digital health services that more efficiently deliver care. Firms that can deliver these objectives stand to grow revenues and market share.
Companies able to reduce costs for payers will improve their ability to protect and grow margins.
Furthermore, companies able to reduce costs for payers will improve their ability to protect and grow margins. Not only will they be afforded greater pricing autonomy, but by avoiding access restrictions they will expand the market potential of their products, driving scale and profitability. To illustrate, Roche’s haemophilia A treatment Hemlibra® (emicizumab) costs almost $500,000 annually per patient. Yet sales are exceeding forecasts because the treatment is clinically effective and helps cut overall costs of treatment by half in the US, for example13.
There are other examples, particularly amidst smaller biotech companies, which are currently a primary source of the innovation in therapeutics being brought to market. Innovation is also emerging across healthcare delivery, via new diagnostic, digital health and medical device solutions that have the ability to reduce costs across the system and improve patient care access.
With clear return opportunities and a need for risk mitigation, investors stand to benefit from a proactive approach.
To address the issue of healthcare affordability, the old pharmaceutical model of charging higher prices for therapies based on added clinical benefits alone must become obsolete. An unaffordable treatment with high profit margins does not translate to sales growth and generates considerably less value for patients and the company, after all.
Companies that continue to deliver treatments that add costs to the entire healthcare system will be hit hardest by tighter budgets, seeing reimbursements denied, or access substantially limited, ultimately hurting sales and profitability. While this is a known risk today, many pharmaceutical companies continue to operate R&D models that only incorporate late stage accessibility considerations. Likewise, industry analysts largely simplify the risk of market access restrictions in their valuation models.
The resulting profitability projections are unlikely to be achieved, due to much smaller patient pools than originally envisioned. This is not only hurting patients by denying access, but will also impact long term company performance and returns for investors. Incorporating these considerations into the investment decision making process provides a more robust understanding of future profitability and the sustainability of business models. Better insights pave the way for superior returns.
With clear return opportunities and a need for risk mitigation, investors stand to benefit from a proactive approach to security selection and company engagement. While one might assume standard ESG scoring would differentiate between healthcare companies contributing more or less to the unsustainable cost strain, per the table below, this is not often the case. Some companies with ‘good’ ESG scores are the worst offenders in raising drug prices unjustifiably.
Better ESG ratings do not equate to healthcare sustainability
|ESG Score||Drug||Incremental cost impact ($m)|
Source: Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (Unsupported Price Increase Report, 2020 Assessment)
For illustrative purposes only and does not constitute any investment recommendation in the above mentioned companies.
In addition to the opportunity to improve returns, investors are in a position to reward companies driving more sustainable business models and behaviour, and challenge those which aren’t.
Hence, industry-specific analysis and understanding is needed to truly ascertain company impacts on healthcare sustainability. These impacts extend beyond the ability of therapies to treat illnesses at a lower price tag. New technologies are increasing opportunities to deliver care more effectively and efficiently. Emerging diagnostic tools are able to identify illnesses at earlier stages, allowing for more effective treatment options that reduce hospital admissions and time in care. Likewise, medical devices are playing a growing role in delivering both preventative and ongoing care more efficiently. Digital health services are also becoming more prominent due to their ability to provide operational efficiencies while expanding access to care. The ongoing pandemic has helped accelerate acceptance of these services.
A holistic approach to therapies, supported by new tools and technology, can help transition healthcare systems to a more sustainable footing. Investors have a key role to play. In addition to the opportunity to improve returns, they are in a position to reward companies driving more sustainable business models and behaviour, and challenge those which aren’t. As we have seen with the issue of climate change over recent years, increased focus can shift the way of thinking. In the case of sustainable healthcare, there is no time to lose.
1Covermymeds patient and provider survey, 2020
2World Health Organization Global Health Expenditure Database
3Brookings/The Hamilton Project - A Dozen Facts about the Economics of the U.S. Healthcare System - March 2020
4IQVIA 2020: EFPIA Patient W.A.I.T. indicator 2019 Survey
5Bloomberg, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2021
6Covermymeds patient and provider survey, 2020
7 Center for economic and social rights 2018: Death by a million cuts
8Journal of Managed care and specialty pharmacy 2017: comparing the approval and coverage decisions of new oncology drugs in the US and other select countries
9The American Journal of Medicine, June 2018
10 American Journal of Public Health, February 2019
11 World Health Organisation Report – Global spending on health: Weathering the storm, 2020
12US Food and Drug Administration, 2021
13 ICER 2018: Emicizumab for Haemophilia A with inhibitors: Effectiveness and value
For illustrative purposes only and does not constitute any investment recommendation in the above mentioned companies.
For Professional Clients and intermediaries within countries and territories set out below; and for Institutional Investors and Financial Advisors in Canada and the US. This document should not be distributed to or relied upon by Retail clients/investors.
The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amount originally invested. The capital invested in the fund can increase or decrease and is not guaranteed. The performance figures contained in this document relate to past performance, which should not be seen as an indication of future returns. Future returns will depend, inter alia, on market conditions, fund manager’s skill, fund risk level and fees. Where overseas investments are held the rate of currency exchange may cause the value of such investments to go down as well as up. Investments in emerging markets are by their nature higher risk and potentially more volatile than those inherent in some established markets. Economies in Emerging Markets generally are heavily dependent upon international trade and, accordingly, have been and may continue to be affected adversely by trade barriers, exchange controls, managed adjustments in relative currency values and other protectionist measures imposed or negotiated by the countries and territories with which they trade. These economies also have been and may continue to be affected adversely by economic conditions in the countries and territories in which they trade. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks, read all scheme related documents carefully.
The contents of this document may not be reproduced or further distributed to any person or entity, whether in whole or in part, for any purpose. All non-authorised reproduction or use of this document will be the responsibility of the user and may lead to legal proceedings. The material contained in this document is for general information purposes only and does not constitute advice or a recommendation to buy or sell investments. Some of the statements contained in this document may be considered forward looking statements which provide current expectations or forecasts of future events. Such forward looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or events and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those described in such forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. We do not undertake any obligation to update the forward-looking statements contained herein, or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements. This document has no contractual value and is not by any means intended as a solicitation, nor a recommendation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument in any jurisdiction in which such an offer is not lawful. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of HSBC Asset Management at the time of preparation, and are subject to change at any time. These views may not necessarily indicate current portfolios' composition. Individual portfolios managed by HSBC Asset Management primarily reflect individual clients' objectives, risk preferences, time horizon, and market liquidity. Foreign and emerging markets. Investments in foreign markets involve risks such as currency rate fluctuations, potential differences in accounting and taxation policies, as well as possible political, economic, and market risks. These risks are heightened for investments in emerging markets which are also subject to greater illiquidity and volatility than developed foreign markets. This commentary is for information purposes only. It is a marketing communication and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to any reader of this content to buy or sell investments nor should it be regarded as investment research. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of its dissemination.
All data from HSBC Asset Management unless otherwise specified. Any third party information has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, but which we have not independently verified.
HSBC Asset Management is the brand name for the asset management business of HSBC Group, which includes the investment activities provided through our local regulated entities. HSBC Asset Management is a group of companies in many countries and territories throughout the world that are engaged in investment advisory and fund management activities, which are ultimately owned by HSBC Holdings Plc. (HSBC Group). The above communication is distributed by the following entities:
In Argentina by HSBC Global Asset Management Argentina S.A., Sociedad Gerente de Fondos Comunes de Inversión, Agente de administración de productos de inversión colectiva de FCI N°1;
In Australia, this document is issued by HSBC Bank Australia Limited ABN 48 006 434 162, AFSL 232595, for HSBC Global Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited ARBN 132 834 149 and HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited ARBN 633 929 718. This document is for institutional investors only, and is not available for distribution to retail clients (as defined under the Corporations Act). HSBC Global Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited and HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited are exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services license under the Corporations Act in respect of the financial services they provide. HSBC Global Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong under the Hong Kong laws, which differ from Australian laws. HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority of the United Kingdom and, for the avoidance of doubt, includes the Financial Services Authority of the United Kingdom as it was previously known before 1 April 2013, under the laws of the United Kingdom, which differ from Australian laws；
In Bermuda by HSBC Global Asset Management (Bermuda) Limited, of 37 Front Street, Hamilton, Bermuda which is licensed to conduct investment business by the Bermuda Monetary Authority;
In Canada by HSBC Global Asset Management (Canada) Limited which provides its services as a dealer in all provinces of Canada except Prince Edward Island and also provides services in Northwest Territories. HSBC Global Asset Management (Canada) Limited provides its services as an advisor in all provinces of Canada except Prince Edward Island;
In Chile: Operations by HSBC's headquarters or other offices of this bank located abroad are not subject to Chilean inspections or regulations and are not covered by warranty of the Chilean state. Further information may be obtained about the state guarantee to deposits at your bank or on www.sbif.cl;
In Colombia: HSBC Bank USA NA has an authorized representative by the Superintendencia Financiera de Colombia (SFC) whereby its activities conform to the General Legal Financial System. SFC has not reviewed the information provided to the investor. This document is for the exclusive use of institutional investors in Colombia and is not for public distribution;
In Finland, Norway, Denmark and Sweden by HSBC Global Asset Management (France), a Portfolio Management Company authorised by the French regulatory authority AMF (no. GP99026) and through the Stockholm branch of HSBC Global Asset Management (France), regulated by the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (Finansinspektionen);
In France, Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Portugal, Greece by HSBC Global Asset Management (France), a Portfolio Management Company authorised by the French regulatory authority AMF (no. GP99026); In Germany by HSBC Global Asset Management (Deutschland) GmbH which is regulated by BaFin (German clients) respective by the Austrian Financial Market Supervision FMA (Austrian clients);
In Hong Kong by HSBC Global Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited, which is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission;
In India by HSBC Asset Management (India) Pvt Ltd. which is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India;
In Israel, HSBC Bank plc (Israel Branch) is regulated by the Bank of Israel. This document is only directed in Israel to qualified investors (under the Investment advice, Investment marketing and Investment portfolio management law-1995) of the Israeli Branch of HBEU for their own use only and is not intended for distribution;
In Italy and Spain by HSBC Global Asset Management (France), a Portfolio Management Company authorised by the French regulatory authority AMF (no. GP99026) and through the Italian and Spanish branches of HSBC Global Asset Management (France), regulated respectively by Banca d’Italia and Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob) in Italy, and the Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV) in Spain;
In Mexico by HSBC Global Asset Management (Mexico), SA de CV, Sociedad Operadora de Fondos de Inversión, Grupo Financiero HSBC which is regulated by Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores;
In the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain & Kuwait by HSBC Bank Middle East Limited which are regulated by relevant local Central Banks for the purpose of this promotion and lead regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority.
In Oman by HSBC Bank Oman S.A.O.G regulated by Central Bank of Oman and Capital Market Authority of Oman;
In Peru: HSBC Bank USA NA has an authorized representative by the Superintendencia de Banca y Seguros in Perú whereby its activities conform to the General Legal Financial System - Law No. 26702. Funds have not been registered before the Superintendencia del Mercado de Valores (SMV) and are being placed by means of a private offer. SMV has not reviewed the information provided to the investor. This document is for the exclusive use of institutional investors in Perú and is not for public distribution;
In Singapore by HSBC Global Asset Management (Singapore) Limited, which is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore;
In Switzerland by HSBC Global Asset Management (Switzerland) AG whose activities are regulated in Switzerland and which activities are, where applicable, duly authorised by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority. Intended exclusively towards qualified investors in the meaning of Art. 10 para 3, 3bis and 3ter of the Federal Collective Investment Schemes Act (CISA);
In Taiwan by HSBC Global Asset Management (Taiwan) Limited which is regulated by the Financial Supervisory Commission R.O.C. (Taiwan);
In the UK by HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority;
And in the US by HSBC Global Asset Management (USA) Inc. which is an investment adviser registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.